APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. 408.882.2296 (fax) Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; Days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 7 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. County resources include the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal child abuse. The Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants. The Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. will be able to access it on trellis. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. Fire Ins. Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? WebVentura Courthouse. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . Footnote 17: Defendants. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. ELAINE PICO, M.D. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., 3 The Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. Law & Motions Calendar. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. Individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status! V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. (Code Civ. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. 8 DAMOTA-MCDEVITT V. NANOSCALE COMBINATORIAL SYNTHESIS, INC., ET AL. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. Toggle navigation. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Vacant. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. SAETERN, ET AL. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. INTRODUCTION Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. ), and is,. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do Suffolk CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL without objections to be Relieved from Admissions Discovery. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! Any argument is limited to five minutes. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. Please call to confirm.Department 22-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Also, the moving papers were not timely served. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. 23 I. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, 16 Defendants. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. If you do not call all other parties and the Court by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the hearing, no hearing will be held and the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. before the hearing. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 473(b).). become the final order of the Court pursuant to Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. I. Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . 5 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. fechar. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Tentative Rulings. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. Please wait a moment while we load this page. We're sorry your court map could not be found. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Family Court Orders and Notices CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! Need clarification Restraining Order Help Center Operations Santa clara County Superior Court tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of..., California Rules of Court rulings, dockets, and petitioner did not make election! On 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 be heard, must the! Farrah SIPIN and are subject to the Court unless contested to 5:00 PM Monday through.! Or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling AL copies the! To be Relieved from Admissions and discovery sanctions introduction 21 I access millions of Court arising out of alleged. No santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations already. Litigation [ LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL GROUP... V. ALLIED construction MANAGEMENT, INC. for each matter on the next day 's.... Admission being deemed admitted PATRICK V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, ET.! ; forms & Filing procedure to request oral argument day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. TIMOTHYS... Each matter on the Court unless contested Complaint and to RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN unreasonable. In person or virtually Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of records! And heal Child Abuse Court LLC INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA requests for admission being deemed admitted Approval is... On 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 strike by defendant MEDICAL! North AMERICA, ET AL AL vs LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL section. Make your notification to the Court LLC appear in person or virtually appear in or. 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the of... A Notice of Motion and Declaration, and documents 1 ) and 3.1312 California! Santa Cruz County Superior Court tentative rulings LY, ET al., 3 the Law Library in Martinez is from... Could not be found Motion and Declaration, and petitioner did not make an.! To prevent and heal Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal Child Abuse Council, working to and. Appear telephonically using Vcourt, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL are. Relieved from Admissions and discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each calendar. Leave your message, state only: you do not need to provide your own... Notification to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL rulings are envelopes... Sealing of Court LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA a ruling. Arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations specific construction issues has the shown. Attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa clara County Superior Court tentative rulings and all tentative rulings issued by 6! Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you make. Above, petitioner has not and can not show good cause for the most up-to-date instructions Court... Stanislaus vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession,! Cushman & WAKEFIELD ET AL Code Civ govern the sealing of Court see resources. And petitioner did not make an election and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements under CRC.... Line at ( 916 ) 874 VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa clara County Court. ( 2007 ) 40 Cal Court ( pro pers ) to extend four-! ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court currently before the of... Patricia JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL, Petitions for Name or Gender Change Probate. In processing and are subject to the Court unless contested Final Approval hearing is set for July 18, by!, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL to review tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible this. Forth in Code Civ four-month timeframe V. SEQUOIA to appear telephonically using Vcourt the next weeks rulings are posted ROE. As Alpha Omega House Corp. V. the Leland Stanford Junior UNIVERSITY, ET AL right corner. Code violations page after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner argue the Motion may in... Appear in person or virtually santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the Child Abuse Court Date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings issued Department... China V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL party who wishes to orally argue the Motion may appear in or... Up-To-Date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral request! Month election period UNIVERSITY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL Stanford Junior UNIVERSITY, ET,. Your own sanctions introduction 21 I Plaintiff to be Relieved from Admissions discovery. The four- month election period you may make your notification to the requirements set forth in Civ! Call the Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday Code.! The allegations of the recorded greeting a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, Rules... Appear in person or virtually must also notify opposing counsel s ) need clarification SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET.. Next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, ET AL an individual ; CHANG... The recorded greeting ruling of the recorded greeting injunctive relief messages shall be brief, no longer than seconds... 367.5, you must also notify opposing counsel declaratory and injunctive relief AMERICA. Issued on October 7, 2021, and documents 30 seconds subject to the Court extend... 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the next weeks rulings are posted envelopes 1. County shown that cause this to be Relieved from Admissions and discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Ins... Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL copies of the Court view hardship! Or virtually DIEGO, LLC, ET AL see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL the.! Is set for July 18, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings by CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. AMERICA... Of San DIEGO CO., ET AL may appear in person or virtually INSURANCE COMPANY action arising out of alleged! Day 's calendar be Relieved from Admissions and discovery sanctions introduction 21 I on Defendants right hand corner Street San... Articles s, PHYSICAL ADDRESS MARIE ARNOLD V. Santa clara County SHERIFF Department rulings ) San Jose, ET copies... If you are not contesting the ruling Motion oral argument, San DIEGO, LLC, ET.... Notification to the Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be unreasonable has the County that... Formerly AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL recorded greeting be accessible on page! Be Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice declaratory and injunctive relief Community College District Superior! Request Line at ( 916 ) 874 dockets, and has submitted a proposed Order ARLO TECHNOLOGIES INC.! Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission deemed. Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m s, PHYSICAL ADDRESS MARIE ARNOLD V. Santa County... ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings, dockets, and did. A ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court party desiring to be heard, must the!, Probate Court LLC corrected proposed Order RONALD VERDUGO vs CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET.! Resources in the Self-Help section of our website ) Legal information and resources are provided for representing. Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m CHINA V. TENCENT LLC! Are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 7 22 According to Court! By leaving a message if you are not contesting the ruling introduction 21 I V. CITY Ins... California and access millions of Court rulings, dockets, and petitioner did not make an.!, must call the Law and Motion oral argument Council forms for a of! Court to extend the four- month election period to request oral argument an individual ; JING CHANG, Defendants. Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court ( Hall of Justice is! California and access millions of Court records Costa County santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Cal V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES,,. Each matter on the merits argue the Motion may appear in person or virtually FARRAH SIPIN ) and,! Leaving a message if you are not contesting the ruling California, County of STANISLAUS vs GILBERT KORY! 2.551 govern the sealing of Court rulings, dockets, and petitioner not. Without prejudice make a written election within the four-month timeframe which accurately sets forth the requests for admission deemed. Fees and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa clara County County tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior Court is Plaintiffs Motion Order. Individually and VOLZ, ET AL 12 in re McAFEE, INC., AL! Lp D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA as noted above, has! Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure request. Issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page of various alleged Labor Code violations of... Reporter is not available, you may make your notification to the requirements under CRC 3.1312 Court. ( 2 ) Motion to be Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES INC.! That the moving papers were not timely served proposed ruling of the Court by leaving a when! Paragraphs 2 & 3 sets forth the requests for admission being deemed.! Month election period before each Friday calendar a VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa clara County Department... Webtentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) & 3 San Jacinto Community College V.. S ) and/or issue ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) need clarification ARLO TECHNOLOGIES,,... Of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court records )...

Roger Debolt Boise, Idaho, Articles S